Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merlina Sarno vs Emily Seibold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sarno vs Seibold analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Merlina Sarno vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sarno 1 - 0 Seibold
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarno has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Seibold has won 44.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarno, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 60.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarno has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 60.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarno has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Seibold winning 44.83% (W/L 13/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8). Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sarno winning 1 times and Seibold being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarno winning 2 and Seibold winning 0. The last match between Sarno and Seibold was at the W25 Tucuman, 31-01-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Merlina Sarno getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sarno and Seibold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sarno winning 0 times and Seibold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sarno winning 0, and Seibold 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarno has played against opponents with an average rank of while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 217.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarno has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarno has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 49.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
824
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
56% (10-8)
Career Total W/L
53% (147-129)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Merlina Sarno vs Emily Seibold For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sarno VS Seibold
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Merlina Sarno | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (52/72) | 41% (28/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (33/52) | 61% (17/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 44% (18/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (34/69) | 43% (31/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Merlina Sarno
Player
Emily Seibold
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
41%
(
28 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merlina Sarno | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (26/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (205/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 154.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (737/1184) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (471/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (201/447) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (88/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (612/1263) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Merlina Sarno Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Merlina Sarno
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Merlina Sarno
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merlina Sarno
Player
Susan Doldan
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Merlina Sarno
Player
Emily Seibold
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
41%
(
28 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Luciana Moyano
Player
Merlina Sarno
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Merlina Sarno
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 7-6(5) 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Selina Dal
Player
Emily Seibold
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Emily Seibold
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sarno Vs Seibold Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sarno are available here and Seibold photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
